See other News & Current Events Articles
Title: The three North American governments make Security and Prosperity Prosperity Agreement Top Priority
Source:
Lou Dobbs Tonight
URL Source: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0703/13/ldt.01.html
Published: Mar 14, 2007
Author: Mr. Lou Dobbs
Post Date: 2007-03-14 17:37:28 by Happy2BMe-OnLP
Ping List: *TREASON ALERT* Subscribe to *TREASON ALERT*
Comments: 143
Christine Romans reports now that more than a dozen states are urging the administration to abandon their plan. (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) CHRISTINE ROMANS, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice over): Crawford, Texas, 2005. Cancun, 2006. Ottawa, last month. At the highest levels, the three North American governments are making the Security and Prosperity Partnership a top priority. Canada's foreign minister last month... PETER MACKAY, CANADIAN MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS: I think it's fitting that for the first time the three of us would meet under the same room that's in the context of the SPP. ROMANS: They're working with major companies, harmonizing regulations, they say, and working to move goods and people more safely and quickly across borders. Arizona state senator Karen Johnson is convinced it's nothing short of a move toward a European-style North American union. She doesn't buy the government position that the SPP is an effort to make all three countries more efficient and safe. KAREN JOHNSON (R), ARIZONA STATE SENATE: How can you harmonize and merge laws together with a narco-state? I mea, that is what Mexico is. It's an oligarchy. It has nothing to do with the way we govern. And Canada, as nice a country as it is, is socialistic. ROMANS: Hers is one of more than a dozen states where lawmakers are considering legislation or passing resolutions opposing the SPP. In the Illinois general assembly, for example, a House resolution cited the "open borders vision of the SPP" and urged the U.S. to withdraw from any further participation in the Security and Prosperity Partnership. The administration denies its avail for some sort of North American union. THOMAS SHANNON, STATE DEPT.: We think that we have kind of created not only a trail of public events, but also a trail of very explicit documents highlighting what it is we're trying to accomplish. ROMANS: But not everyone supports what they're trying to accomplish. (END VIDEOTAPE) ROMANS: Lawmakers like Karen Johnson in Arizona fear an assault on sovereignty and states' rights. And Canada, the liberals fear for their benefits and welfare system, and for their social network that they have there. And from the Mexican press point of view, at the Ottawa event last month some very pointed questions and outright skepticism about whether the United States is thinking about anybody but itself in all of this. DOBBS: Well, I would think that the Mexican press would give the United States great credit taking care of 20 million of its citizens here. I mean, that's -- that seems like such a harsh view for the Mexican press to adopt. What kind of idiots are the American people that we put up with this kind of nonsense? That we tolerate a president -- I can't even imagine what the Canadians are thinking. The Canadians, they've got a wonderful country, wonderful people. They're being rolled over just like we are. I just can't understand why there isn't an absolute, just straight out statement from every American to the U.S. government, "Stick it, and don't pull this again"? ROMANS: I'm not sure what -- I can't speak to the intellectual capacity of the American people or their ability to band together, but, you know... DOBBS: Well, the intellectual capacity -- I can speak to it. We're a wonderful, smart people. But we put up with so much nonsense. It's -- it's getting to the point of disgust. Anyway, thanks for riling me up. ROMANS: I'm sorry to rile you up, Lou. DOBBS: Thank you very much. ROMANS: Well, the state lawmakers have definitely made their voice heard on this. So... DOBBS: Well, good. It's time people got riled up in this country. ROMANS: So maybe that's where the American people's voice is heard, through the state legislature. DOBBS: Absolutely. I hope that they'll get something done on this for all our sakes. Well, state lawmakers tonight are asking tough questions about the Security and Prosperity Partnership, what some call the North American Union. It's a plan devised by the Council of Foreign Relations, supported by big business and government elites to integrate the economies of the United States, Mexico, and Canada, with, of course, no congressional or voter oversight or approval.
Subscribe to *TREASON ALERT*
[Thread Locked]
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-40) not displayed.
.
.
.
#41. To: SovereignMan (#28)
informationliberation - North American Union Threatens U.S. ... Of course...there's always the slight of hand by fiat...so, does it matter? (I'm crossing my fingers that it does)
I hope so too. The cost of freedom isn't free.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/cover010307.htm Illegal immigration, amnesty, European Union The North America Union's Mexico Connection By Judi McLeod Wednesday, January 3, 2007 Mexico is sitting pretty in the event of the formation of a North American Union (NAU). Its Third World status would be wiped off the slate in the NAU. That's because the United States of America has already absorbed millions of Mexicans and millions more keep pouring over the border. "In a letter dated February 2004, no less an authority than Arizona Senator John McCain recognized that Border Patrol apprehension figures demonstrated that "almost four million people crossed our borders illegally (in) 2002—experts on the subject agree that illegal crossings have only increased since then." (www.theamericanresistance.com). "The Tucson sector Border Patrol union Local 2544 on the number of illegal aliens in our nation: "There are currently 15 to 20 million illegal aliens in this country by many estimates, but the real numbers could be much higher and the numbers increase every day because our borders are not secure (no matter what the politicians tell you—don't believe them for a second)." "In agreement with Senator McCain, our counters are calibrated to reflect an increase of 10,000 total additional illegal aliens added to the United States population each day. Is the NAU the political answer for amnesty? The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPPNA) sounds innocuous. Ditto for the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). While most folk are busy paying taxes, organizations with innocuous sounding names are virtually ignored. But on March 23, 2005 in Waco Texas, President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vincente Fox and Prime Minister Paul Martin issued a joint statement to announce the establishment of SPPNA. SPPNA is the frontrunner of a European Union style North American Union. Both political parties in the US have failed John and Josephine Q. Public on border control. Will the NAU be introduced as a necessity now that the Mexicans represent such a large part of the American population? Patriots working around the clock to protect the sovereignty of the USA recognize the big players behind the NAU. They know that Robert Pastor, a leading intellectual force in the move to create the NAU believes a new 9/11 crisis could be the catalyst to merge the U.S., Mexico and Canada. They know that the godfather of the crisis theorists, Canadian Maurice Strong was successful in bringing the Communist China Chery Automobile Co. to Detroit to manufacture cars that will be sold worldwide. Patriots also know that "The Independent Task Force for North America", led by US, Canadian and Mexican officials was sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations. Now thanks to Canadian author and politician Mel Hurtig, there are more pieces in the puzzle known as the Mexican Connection. North American Forum confirmed participants include Arturo Sarukhan, the Coordinator of International Affairs, Campaign of Felipe Calderon and Juan Camilo Mourino, General Coordinator of President Elect's transition team. The controversial outcome of July 2nd, 2006 presidential election in Mexico contains another piece of the NAU puzzle. "Felipe Calderon, described as the conservative candidate and Bush favorite, reportedly defeated Andres Manual Lopez Obrador by a very narrow margin." (www.hoanewsnetwork.com). "Obrador was opposed to the North American Union. Calderon supports the CFR agenda." As the website warns, "This is not a drill! This is as real as it gets and it is happening as we speak. The only thing that can stop it is the emergence of thousands of aggressive pockets of resistance that refuse to surrender. We the People must counter-attack, using all disposable means. Your state legislators are still assessable. They must be educated on this treasonous scheme immediately and driven to take action to prevent your state from being part of the North American Union. The state has the inherent right to withdraw from the Union if the federal government signs over any of its sovereignty to the trilateral commission. "Never give up!" Europeans who woke up too late now call the European Union home and not the country of their birth. Canada Free Press founding editor Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years experience in the print media. Her work has appeared on Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com, Glenn Beck and The Rant. Judi can be reached at: letters@canadafreepress.com
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/Update2007-02-12.htm February 12, 2007 North American Union: A Profound Solution To The Treachery If Faced With Treason We The People Have A Duty, And The Legal Power To End It In yesterday’s article on Illegal Immigration we showed that Mexico is invading the United States: This is a war without a declaration of war. We also showed that the President of the United States was adhering to this enemy of the United States by giving aid and comfort to Mexico and its invaders and that Congress was acquiescing: This is treason. We also showed that the People have the Duty, the Right and the constitutional Power to peaceably procure relief by forcing the Government of the United States to faithfully execute the immigration laws and to otherwise honor and defend the Constitution: This is the power of the First Amendment Right to Petition for Redress of Grievances. The “North American Union” Today, we cover the “rest of the story,” that explains why the President of the United States has attached himself to the political leaders of Mexico by personal union and conformity of principles and opinions. The rumors of a North American Union are true. The evidence is mounting. The President and the Congress, who have obviously allowed the invasion from Mexico to go unchecked for years, would now compound that constitutional tort by “legalizing” the invasion. How? By creating a North American Union (NAU) eliminating the borders of the United States with Mexico and Canada, and replacing their existing currencies with a new common currency – the “Amero.” It is irksome and wearisome, to say the least, to learn that while we, the People, have been paying attention to our families and our careers (and our property taxes and income taxes), and believing the Government to be benevolent and acting in the interest of defending the Constitution and the Rights, Freedoms and Liberties of the People, the Republic has, in fact, actually been undermined by a shadow government that has manufactured a national crisis and concocted the solution of a “North American Union” with the intent of providing benefits to elected officials and their unrighteous corporate, financial and political friends.. In order to avoid alarming the People unduly, the Union is being quietly erected piecemeal, under the cover of international treaties, trade agreements and partnerships, Executive orders, etc. -- all without full disclosure or debate. The Union, if successfully implemented, will come forth at the direct expense of the Constitution, the Liberty of the People, and the sovereignty of the Republic. The most comprehensive, credible, free articles we have uncovered on the people, events and dynamics behind the rush to a North American Union can be found on-line at www.augustreview.com and www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com.. Illustration of proposed NAFTA commercial super-highway system We encourage everyone to read the articles thoroughly and to distribute them widely. The stated target for full implementation of the North American Union is 2010. Here are some of the facts: In 2002, Mexico” President Vicente Fox declared: "Our long-range objective is to establish with the United States ... an ensemble of connections and institutions similar to those created by the European Union …The new framework we wish to construct is inspired in the example of the European Union." Corporate America, the principal force behind NAFTA, immediately got behind the North American Union. Robert Bartley, editorial page editor of The Wall Street Journal, declared the President of Mexico a "visionary." Bartley wrote, "He (Fox) can rest assured that there is one voice north of the Rio Grande that supports his vision ... this newspaper." In April of 2005, Mexico’s Foreign Secretary Luis Ernesto Debrez publicly declared that what Mexico is about (meaning its invasion of the United States) is "complete integration" of Mexico and the United States – that is, a merger of the two countries. In August of 2006, Dr. Robert Pastor, vice chair of the Council on Foreign Relations Task Force on North America, appeared before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. Pastor called for a merger of the United States, Mexico and Canada. Pastor said it would be called the North American Union and that it would extend from Prudhoe Bay in Alaska to Guatemala, with no borders in between. In September of 2006, political, corporate and financial elite from the three countries met secretly in Canada to further develop the vision of the North American Union. However, thanks to Judicial Watch, who filed a FOIA request and succeeded in obtaining written documents from that meeting, the People have learned more about the status of the plans to develop the North American Union, who attended the meeting and the desires of the group to evolve the NAU as much as possible by “stealth.” According to WorldNetDaily.com (North American Activists Plotted Stealth Strategy, January 30, 2007), “Participants in a high-level, closed door, three-day conference on the integration of the three North American nations debated whether openness about goals was preferred to a stealthy policy of building infrastructure before a vision of the end result was even laid out to the people of the U.S., Mexico and Canada, according to notes obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.” Quoting WorldNetDailey.com, “At least one attendee of the conference said the meeting was intended to subvert the democratic process. Mel Hurtig, a Canadian author and publisher elected as the leader of the National Party of Canada, told WND last fall the idea of the North American Forum is to move the countries toward integration without public consent or even knowledge. "What is sinister about this meeting is that it involved high level government officials and some of the top and most powerful business leaders of the three countries and the North American Forum in organizing the meeting intentionally did not inform the press in any of the three countries," he said. "It was clear that the intention was to keep this important meeting about integrating the three countries out of the public eye." The North American Union Is A Bad Idea That Requires A Constitutional Amendment We, the People must act, and we must act now. The longer we wait, the greater the threat to our Constitutional Republic, system of governance and national sovereignty. The Sovereign nature of the People, the several states, and the political entity known as the United States of America cannot be altered without a constitutional amendment. In fact, it can be forcefully argued that our Constitution, as adopted, prohibits altogether the type of Union being slowly imposed upon us through means of stealth and deception by those that control and influence our government. Fortunately, We, the People possess the Constitutional means to force the President and the Congress, without violence, to honor and defend the Constitution. The founding fathers knew our Constitution, with its Bill of Rights, would not be able to defend itself when the day came, such as now, when the Government would turn a blind eye to the Constitution, seeing only its own, self-serving agenda and interests. To enable us, We, the People, to hold the Government accountable to the Constitution, the founders included the “capstone Right”– the individual Right that allows the People to enforce the Constitution when the Executive, Legislative or Judicial branches of the Government of the United States refuse to do so. Our capstone Right is in the Bill of Rights. It’s the fifth of the five Rights guaranteed by the First Amendment: Congress shall make no law…abridging… the Right of the People…to Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances.” This Right, first articulated in writing in Magna Carta in 1215 (see below), is the essence of Popular Sovereignty -- i.e., the natural Right of Men over their servant governments and is the cornerstone of our form of governance. The Profound Capstone Right Here is how common sense and the Founders tell us, We, the People, ought to go about obtaining relief from government acts that are repugnant to our Constitution: First, upon injury or threat of injury by the Government, the People are to draft and serve the Government with a written Petition for Redress of their Grievances. The People may rightfully Petition when Government threatens abuse of its limited, delegated authority or when it otherwise fails to function according to the Constitution. Second, the Government is then required, as a servant and creation of the People, and by the legal nature of the Right of Petition, to respond to the Petition for Redress of Grievances. Third, if the Government refuses to respond or to provide Redress as demanded in the Petition, the People possess the lawful authority to withdraw their financial support from the Government until it provides Redress to the People. It’s that simple -- and that profound and powerful: No Redress, NO TAXES. In fact, we believe this Right of Petition is so powerful and constitutionally entrenched that the Internal Revenue Service is prohibited by the Constitution from enforcing the Internal Revenue laws against those rightfully claiming and exercising the Right (note: this specific legal issue is currently before the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington DC. See the lawsuit Information Center for We The People vs. The United States Government). Of course, the People always retain as a final measure, the Right to claim and exercise their Rights under the Second Amendment if the First Amendment fails to peaceably procure the relief the People are entitled to. Given the urgency of the facts and circumstances surrounding the current invasion of illegal immigrants and the stealthy rush to create a North American Union, We, the People have a duty to perform in defense of our Constitutional Republic and Rule of Law. This duty is not a vague political concept, but an individual responsibility of every citizen of the United States of America. The Petition For Redress Regarding The North American Union We must take the first step. We, the People must Petition the United States Government for Redress of Grievances regarding the North American Union. CLICK HERE to READ and SIGN the North American Union Petition for Redress It will be served on every member of Congress and the President by March 15, 2007. The more signatures the better. A transmittal letter will be served along with each Petition. The letter will state that the on March 30, 2007, the People will assemble at Lafayette Park opposite the White House at 1 p.m., to await the response from the President and the Congress. The letter will warn the President and the Congress that should they fail in their constitutional obligation to provide a responsive response to the Petition for Redress, the People will not be filing tax returns for 2006 and will retain their money until their Grievances are Redressed. The People, By Right And By Law, Possess The Power To Stop The North American Union In an official Act passed unanimously by the Continental Congress in 1774 (the same Congress that adopted the Declaration of Independence), the Founders said, "If money is wanted by Rulers who have in any manner oppressed the People, they may retain it until their grievances are redressed, and thus peaceably procure relief, without trusting to despised petitions or disturbing the public tranquility." See Journals of the Continental Congress,1:105-113 There is absolutely nothing in American history or Jurisprudence that contradicts this interpretation of the meaning of the capstone Right. For instance, no court has ever declared the meaning of the capstone Right; because its meaning was well understood, and there is ample documentary evidence supporting our interpretation In fact, the essence of the Natural Right of Men over their servant governments was first expressed in writing as part of Magna Carta, signed June 15, 1215. This written document established the basis of Law for Western Civilization as man struggled out of the Dark Ages. It was this agreement, between the governed, and their servant governors, that enumerated the Natural Rights of man and the Obligations of the Government. These principles of governance withstood the test of centuries of war, progress and enlightenment, eventually becoming embodied, and soundly restated in America’s founding documents. In short, the Rights enumerated in Magna Carta formed the very foundation of our modern systems of Law, Justice, Property, Labor, and Security. Magna Carta was the first instrument of written Law to proclaim the Natural Rights of Man, including popular sovereignty and government based on the consent of the governed. For instance, Section 61 of the Magna Carta states the following: “If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is made known to four of the said twenty-five barons, they shall come to us - or in our absence from the kingdom to the chief justice - to declare it and claim immediate redress. If we, or in our absence abroad the chief justice, make no redress within forty days, reckoning from the day on which the offence was declared to us or to him, the four barons shall refer the matter to the rest of the twenty-five barons, who may distrain upon and assail us in every way possible, with the support of the whole community of the land, by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, or anything else saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children, until they have secured such redress as they have determined upon. Having secured the redress, they may then resume their normal obedience to us.” Section 61 of the Magna Carta, in effect, recognizes and provides for the Natural and inherent Right of the People to physically attack and seize, if necessary, the officers and property of the Government in order to secure Redress against the Government’s transgressions upon the Rights of the People should the Government fail to respond to the People’s Petitions in forty days. Section 61, in part, articulates the Right of the People to Petition their Government for Redress of Grievances and to use violent force, if necessary, to secure such Redress. However, we are suggesting a non-violent response to any failure by the Government to properly respond to our proper Petition for Redress: No Answers, No Taxes. Thomas Jefferson wrote, "The privilege of giving or withholding our moneys is an important barrier against the undue exertion of prerogative which if left altogether without control may be exercised to our great oppression; and all history shows how efficacious its intercession for redress of grievances and establishment of rights, and how improvident would be the surrender of so powerful a mediator." See Thomas Jefferson: Reply to Lord North, 1775. Papers 1:225. Our Declaration of Independence provides additional clarification of the meaning to the importance of the capstone Right, stating, “In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms. Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by with repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is thus unfit to be the ruler of a free people….” The preamble to the Bill of Rights states: “The Conventions of a Number of the States having at the Time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a Desire, in Order to prevent Misconstruction or Abuse of its Powers, that further declaratory and restrictive Clauses should be added: And as extending the Ground of public Confidence in the Government will best insure the beneficent Ends of its Institution….” No Redress, NO Taxes: A Constitutional Solution To The Sellout Of America In the end, the solution is profound, simple, and available BY LAW to EVERY INDIVIDUAL citizen of the United States of America: 1) Petition the Government and Demand Redress to stop those who would deliver up America to a North American Union. 2) If NO Redress is secured, every Citizen must withhold their taxes. This is the solution provided by our Founders. It is simple. It is non-violent. It is designed to confront and resolve government oppression or dereliction of duty. Most importantly, every individual American possesses the Right to participate in the process – to help cure what the political process can’t cure. It is crucial to remember that although the immigration and North American Union issues may facially appear to be political in nature, they are more accurately “constitutional torts” -- i.e., the direct result of the Government’s failure to honor and defend the Constitution. It is time to recognize that the immigration dilemma cannot, and will not find a constitutional solution in a North American Union. Our political parties and their designees are far too beholden to political, corporate and financial interests to act in the People’s interest. These forces of corruption and influence are so strong that they have induced the Government -- the servant of the People -- to abandon the People’s Rule Book, the Constitution of the United States of America. At the end of the day it is We, the People who must take personal responsibility for the protection, preservation, and enhancement of the individual, unalienable Rights endowed by the Creator and guaranteed by the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The Constitution cannot defend itself. That IS the responsibility of the beneficiaries of its inherent blessings. Please join us in claiming and exercising the Right to Petition the Government for a Redress (Remedy) of the Grievances attendant upon the invasion of illegal immigrants and the proposed North American Union. The attention of anyone wishing to know more about the Rights of the People and the Obligations of the Government under the capstone Right is invited to the legal briefs currently before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in the case of We The People v United States ( Click here), and the only Law Review Articles ever published on the subject (Click here). Los Angeles, CA protest, March 2006 Click Here to READ & SIGN the North American Union Petition For Redress Click Here to READ & SIGN the Immigration Petition For Redress Click to read our update on Illegal Immigration and the Right to Petition Please support the work of the WTP Foundation
I believe it was George W. Bush that called our consitution just a "GDPoP", and whose Attorney General can't find habeas corpus rights for Americans.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53271 NEW WORLD DISORDER Chinese have ownership in U.S. cargo monitors Firm tied to communist regime involved in deal to set up high-tech sensors Posted: December 7, 2006 1:00 a.m. Eastern By Jerome R. Corsi © 2006 WorldNetDaily.com A Chinese company with close ties to the communist government owns 49 percent of the Lockheed Martin subsidiary that is negotiating a contract with the North American SuperCorridor Coalition, Inc. – the Dallas-based trade association – to place cargo monitoring sensors along as superhighway stretching from Mexico to Canada. China's Hutchinson Port Holdings entered into a $50 million joint venture in 2005 with Savi Technology, a Lockheed Martin wholly-owned subsidiary, to form a new company called Savi Networks LLC. Savi Technology owns 51 percent and Hutchinson Port Holdings, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Chinese holding company Hutchinson Whampoa Limited, holds the rest. Lockheed Martin spokeswoman Leslie Holoweiko confirmed to WND that Savi Networks LLC is the company named in the contract currently being negotiated with NASCO to provide cargo sensors all along the NASCO I-35 super-corridor. If successfully negotiated, the contract would appear to give Hutchinson Holdings operational involvement all along the emerging I-35 NAFTA superhighway. Hutchinson Holdings also operates the port at Lázaro Cárdenas, Mexico. Hutchinson, Whampoa, Ltd. is the holding company of billionaire Li Ka-shing, a well-known businessman, whose companies make up 15 percent of the market capitalization of the Hong Kong Stock Market. According to the Washington, D.C., government watchdog Judicial Watch, a declassified U.S. government intelligence report that Judicial Watch obtained in a Freedom of Information Act request indicates Li is "directly connected to Beijing and is willing to use his business influence to further the aims of the Chinese Government." A Judicial Watch complaint filed in 2002 at the time HWL was purchasing the then-bankrupt Global Crossing, notes Li Ka-Shing's holdings includes ports, telecom and energy assets around the world. Hutchinson Ports was forced to drop a bid to purchase Global Crossing when the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States refused to approve the transaction on national security grounds. Savi Networks LLC operates RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) equipment and software to track and manage containerized ocean-going cargo. According to the company, the goal of Savi Networks LLC is to install "active RFID equipment and software in participating ports around the world to provide users with information on the identity, location and status of their ocean cargo containers as they pass through such ports." Conceivably, the Savi-installed RFID software would permit NASCO to track containers from the time they leave ports in China and the Far East to when they enter North America at Mexican ports such as Lázaro Cárdenas. Data on the cargo could be read then by any sensor-reading station the Savi-NASCO project placed anywhere along what NASCO calls the North American SuperCorridor, generally identified by NASCO as incorporating Interstates 35, 29 and 94. NASCO and Savi Networks LLC plan to put Savi sensor reading stations all the way north, to destinations in Canada such as Winnipeg. The Savi technology includes an architecture designed to accommodate Automatic Identification Data Collection (AIDC) technologies, such as is used in barcodes, RFID technologies and Global Positioning Systems (GPS) that can track container ships on the ocean or the containers as they travel on land by truck or train. The NASCO plan to use cargo tracking technology is consistent with the plans announced by the working groups in the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, to rely primarily on technology, instead of in-person inspection, to track and monitor containers entering the U.S. As disclosed in the "2005 Report to Leaders" on the SPP website, FAST lanes and SENTRI software will be used extensively to "streamline the secure movement of low-risk traffic across our shared borders" with Mexico and Canada. The Security and Prosperity Partnership was declared by President Bush, Mexico's President Fox and then-Prime Minister Paul Martin of Canada at their summit meeting in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005. Global Crossing was noted for turning Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe's $100,000 investment into an $18 million personal fortune. The company's bold move to control the U.S. international fiber-optics network, however, ending in a corrupt, corporate meltdown that preceded the Enron debacle.
Nice.
Trade, environment, family law. They're covering everything. It will require a new constitution.
No, it ain't. And I have plans to buy and learn how to shoot that shot gun this summer.
http://www.stpns.net/view_article.html?articleId=21048704288682848 January 05, 2007 COLUMNIST United States Needs No North American Union By Luther Broaddus for Mountain Mail SOCORRO, New Mexico (STPNS) -- An expansion of my :Comments” from the December 28, 2006, edition of the Mountain Mail. Two years ago, I received a call from a young Texas rancher who told me he was going to lose his ranch to a highway to be built by foreigners … a few questions later, and we were told the governmental agency would not tell him where the highway was going, only that it would run “from the South to the North.” A neighboring rancher contacted his attorney, who reported that he (the attorney) could find out very little, only that there is going to be a highway, and apparently, their land would be taken by a “version” of imminent domain; however, there would be no price negotiations, the federal government was involved, and it was setting the price … period. About a year ago, a rancher from western Arizona called and started telling me a similar story. After listening for a minute or two, I interrupted and told him the “rest of his story” by repeating the young Texan’s story. The Arizonan and I were dumbfounded, when comparing our notes; we found basically the same story. Today, the story, although still smoky, is becoming clearer. The two roads in questions are part of a mega-transportation system of truly super-highways. As described last week, the first of these will start on Mexico’s West coast at Lazaro Cardenas, come inland to Mexico City, north to Monterrey, and cross into the United States near Laredo, Texas, then north to Austin, Dallas, Oklahoma City, Kansas City, Bismarck, and finally Regina, Winnipeg, and Churchill, Manitoba, Canada. This has been referred to as a pipedream by some people who do not want any publicity “yet” (read: they don’t want the public to know anything about it until it is too late to stop it). You can get a pretty complete rundown on 80 of the high priority corridors in the United States by logging on to aaroads.com/high-priority/ table.html. This information will show the “desired routes” of the new super highways as proposed by the North American Forum on Integration (NAFI).” This is an unelected group of internationalists; some from the United States, many not; all members of the Council on Foreign Relations, whose stated goal is to use this highway to connect Canada, the United States and Mexico, the three NAFTA signatories, into a new country, the North American Union, with its own currency, which they have designated the Amero. When the vote for the FTAA failed, President Bush reportedly lost his cool and in raised voice said, “The fools need the FTAA to compete with the European Union and its euro.” Maybe he will get his way if the NAFI highways and the plans of the Council on Foreign Relations to join Canada, the United States and Mexico are finalized. A college professor friend from San Antonio, Texas, who is aware of the program, called to tell me it is being done in such secrecy, none of his students have ever heard of the international highway locally known as the NAFTA superhighway … and it goes right through their area. This will destroy our nation, its laws, and the “dollar.” Frankly, I do not want anything to do with a government that has Mexico as a partner, or an economy that has the peso as a partner. They are both losers. I have been called an isolationist, an extremist and worse. However, I believe Americans from sea to shining sea will be calling the President and their congressmen much worse when the truth is learned about how they Globalized the United States and destroyed our freedoms and property rights … the same freedoms and rights 300,000 American boys died fighting for in World War II. Next week … information on WHO is putting up the cash for this project, and how it will reduce the United States’ standard of living to that of Mexico. Copyright January ‘07, by Luther Broaddus III, Magdalena, NM 87825. Luther Broaddus, publisher of Luther’s Comments, a nationally circulated column for local weekly newspapers, lives in the high mountains, southwest of Magdalena. He is solely responsible for its content. E-mail him at lbroaddus@gilanet.com. © 2007 Mountain Mail Socorro, New Mexico. All Rights Reserved. This content, including derivations, may not be stored or distributed in any manner, disseminated, published, broadcast, rewritten or reproduced without express, written consent from STPNS.
http://newsblaze.com/story/20070107092239nnnn.nb/newsblaze/OPINIONS/Opinions.html North American Union - It's Coming By William H. Calhoun If you have not read the news in a few months, you may be unaware: there are plans to create a North American Union, whereby Mexico, the United States and Canada will eventually become a single country, with a single currency and a single superhighway system. Construction on the NAFTA Superhighway, encompassing I-69 and directed by NASCO, has already begun in two states. It will run from central Mexico, through the middle of the United States, through Kansas City, and up into Canada. It will be four football fields wide, off limits to most Americans, and run by foreign companies. The mechanism to implement the NAU is the SPP (Strategic and Prosperity Partnership of North America), which was settled between President Bush, President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin during their March 2005 summit meeting in Waco, Texas. Sec. of State Condoleezza Rice has been instrumental in setting the SPP plans in motion. The North American Union will modeled after ultra-liberal European Union, and put in place by administrative regulations under the SPP umbrella. Outraged by this plan, four patriotic Congressmen (Reps. Virgil H. Good, Walter B. Jones, Ron Paul, and Tom Tancredo) have introduced H. Con. Res. 487, which states that "the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada." In the last few weeks, patriot Americans from all over the United States have been telephoning their Congressmen demanding that H. Con. Res. 487 be put to a vote and passed in 2007. Nevertheless, cheerleaders for the Bush Administration deny that any plans for a North American Union exist. Neocon Michael Medved says that "there's no reason at all to believe in the ludicrous, childish, ill-informed, manipulative, brain dead fantasies about a North American Union. The entire chimera has been conjured up to scare people over nothing...." If there are no plans for a North American Union, then why did four of the most patriotic Congressmen see it necessary to introduce H. Con. Res. 487? And if it is not real, then what would H. Con. Res. 487 harm? Legislation preventing a "chimera" certainly cannot present any danger. Why are neocon Trotskyites like Medved becoming so emotionally unstable over a bill to prevent a "chimera"? To any discerning mind, plans for a North American Union do exist. One only need to look at the wording of SPP documents, or look at the NASCO website. It has been set in motion. As Cicero famously said, "patere tua consilia non sentis, constrictam iam horum omnium scientia teneri coniurationem tuam non vides?" How have we come to this place? The NAFTA agreement can be seen as the beginning, which the wisest recognized as a disaster from day one. Historically, conservatives have opposed free trade, and they should. It is destroying our economy, it is undermining our sovereignty, and it is national suicide. Many in the GOP, however, have been "neoconned" on this issue. To see the connection between free trade the dissolution of the USA under the North American Union, only need to read Karl Marx. On Jan. 9, 1848, in "On the Question of Free Trade," Marx said, "...in general, the protective system of our day is conservative, while the free trade system is destructive. It breaks up old nationalities and pushes the antagonism of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie to the extreme point. In a word, the free trade system hastens the social revolution. It is in this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, that I vote in favor of free trade." Notice, Marx's celebration of the breaking up of "old nationalities." Such a statement is similar to GW Bush's claim that the USA is not an "actual place," but an "idea." Neocons celebrate this Marxist notion of a "propositional nation," because it removes the historic prerequisites of nationhood: borders; a common language, history and genealogy; blood and soil; kith and kin; and genophilia (instinctive attachment to family and tribe). It is thus that GW Bush and others have so adamantly supported the third-world invasion of American, and why many predict that the 700-mile fence will not be built. The U.S.-Mexico border must be abolished for the implementation of the North American Union. It is all about profit and cheap labor, and big business adamantly supports the prerequisite of the North American Union: the third-world invasion of America. During the Cold War, big business sided with many conservatives to oppose Marxism. Now, however, most large corporations side with the internationalist Left. In the 1950s, when our country was invaded, President Eisenhower responded with "Operation Wetback" and deported around a million invaders in a single year. Today, however, politicians say they are unable. Rather, they are unwilling. Some of the greatest traitors in American history are right before our eyes: GW Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, John McCain, Arlen Specter, Lindsey Graham, Mike Huckabee, Sam Brownback, Linda Chavez, Alberto Gonzales, Carlos Gutierrez, Ted Kennedy, Barack Obama, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, John Edwards, Harry Reid, Linda Sanchez, Robert Menendez, Luis Gutierrez, Solomon Ortiz, and the list goes on and on. These miscreants have chosen Mexico, multicultural political correctness, and big business over hard-working Americans. They have betrayed Middle America. And what can be done to stop this North American Union (aka, treason)? Call and write your Congressmen, and demand a real patriotic President in 2008, like Duncan Hunter or Tom Tancredo. We are under attack - both from within and without. Prepare for the oncoming madness! Stop the North American Union! Stop the third-world invasion! William H. Calhoun is a writer, paleoconservative, poet-warrior in the classical sense, farmer on his ancestral estate, and graduate of the University of Chicago. He can be reached at williamhcalhoun@yahoo.com alan@newsblaze.com Copyright © 2006, NewsBlaze, Daily News
http://www.rense.com/general74/foeo.htm More Insults About The 'North American Conspiracy' By Jerome R. Corsi 1-6-7 Conservative blogger John Hawkins of Right Wing News has now decided to join Michael Medved in a new ad hominem attack by using a disparaging adjective to call me a name ("kooky") and placing me No. 3 in the list of the 20 "people on the right" he finds most annoying. Hawkins places me between No. 2 Mark Foley, whom Hawkins characterizes as a "page-molesting pervert," and No. 4 Duke Cunningham, the congressman Hawkins notes is "going to jail for 8 years after taking a bribe." I am honored to be included on any list John Hawkins wishes to create. But, as far as I can determine, my offense to Hawkins involves writing with the scope of the 1st Amendment, an offense that Hawkins considers somewhat worse than taking bribes, but not quite as bad as making salacious approaches to underage male employees. I first want to thank Hawkins for his continuing campaign to draw attention to my arguments. Second, I wonder how much additional writing I will have to produce before Hawkins reduces himself to the "liar, liar" ranting stage Michael Medved exhibited in his recent emotional tirade published on Townhall.com. I guess I will have to read more of Hawkins's writing to determine if I find his views annoying, but upon introspection I find I have no emotional reaction whatsoever, even to his characterization that I am somehow "annoying" to him. Perhaps President Bush drew solace that he was listed seven positions below me on Hawkins's "most annoying" list. I apologize to President Bush that Hawkins could not find a better pejorative for him than "incompetent." Clearly in Hawkins's hierarchy to be "kooky" in writing a political commentary is much more annoying to him than to be merely "incompetent" in conducting the affairs of the nation's highest elected post. Arguing that my writings advance a "completely moronic North American conspiracy theory," Hawkins linked to an old post he had written on his blog last summer. In an exchange published in July on HUMAN EVENTS' Right Angle blog, I answered these and other objections raised by Hawkins. The exchange ended when Hawkins chose not to respond. Hawkins has never answered my last specific rebuttals published on the blog. Merely repeating his initial arguments would be considered "non responsive" in traditional debate theory. Besides, I have never argued a "North American conspiracy." The European Union and the Euro are realities today, not a conspiracy theory. So too, North American integration is proceeding rapidly right now, fully documented, as the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America attests if you reference the Department of Commerce website SPP.gov. Equally, the Trans-Texas Corridor is proceeding rapidly, as documented by the Texas Department of Commerce website. If either the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America or the Trans-Texas Corridor is a conspiracy, the conspiracy is being perpetrated by government officials on their public websites. We will grant that the now public writings of those who advanced the European Union, such as the memoirs of EU intellectual architect Jean Monnet, confess after the fact that a stealth method was pursued to create the European Union. As Christopher Booker and Richard North, co-authors of the 2003 book, "The Great Deception: A Secret History of the European Union," write that Jean Monnet "knew that only by operating in the shadows, behind a cloak of obscurity could he one day realize his dream." Architects of North American integration, such as Robert Pastor of American University, breathe new life into stealth politics when suggesting openly that a new 9/11 crisis may be just the event needed to advance his agenda for creating the "North American Community" he openly professes. At any rate, I invite Hawkins to resume his debate with me. To make the process easy, we will link to the exchange. Seeing that I wrote the last rejoinder there, the next move appears to be up to Hawkins. Is Hawkins up to calm, rational debate, or does he want to leave his comments at the level of calumny, an ad hominem attack which always belies an inability to win the argument any other way? My writing has been aimed at making sure that North American integration does not advance to the point where a North American Union emerges after what may be a decades-long incremental process. I want to be sure that the United States does not follow the template set in place by how the European Union and the euro emerged over some fifty years, driven by an intellectual elite and evolving step-by- step from an initial, seemingly innocuous continental steel and coal agreement. What is it exactly that Hawkins finds annoying-that a NAU and the Amero could be the end result of the North American integration currently happening, or that I might suggest the Bush Administration could be following the Jean Monnet path intentionally? Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians," and most recently, "Minutemen: The Battle to Secure America's Borders." He will soon author a book on the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and the prospect of the forthcoming North American Union.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/lamb073106.htm NAFTA, Immigration, North American Union Super-Corridor to oblivion Henry Lamb Monday, July 31, 2006 There is growing concern about the proposed "Super-Corridor" from the Southern tip of Mexico to Canada. The project, underway for more than a decade, is just now being introduced to the public. And the public doesn’t like what they are hearing. Confusion about the project is rampant because the project is still primarily a concept, in the planning stages, and most of the final decisions will not be made for some time. Several very important decisions, however, have already been made. The North American International Trade Corridor Partnership has officially amalgamated with the North American SuperCorridor Coalition (NASCO) to promote the development of a trade corridor designed to expedite the flow of trade through the North American Continent. NASCO is a not-for-profit lobbying organization that has received $2.5 million in Congressional earmarks from the Department of Transportation to promote the corridor concept. Their 24-member board of directors includes county commissioners from four Texas Counties; an Oklahoma state senator, and a member of OK-DOT; two officials from the Texas DOT; attorneys, a couple of construction company officials, and an official of the U.S.-Mexico Chamber of Commerce. Membership fees range from $500 for an individual, up to $25,000 for government entities. Membership includes several U.S. government entities. NASCO claims that "There are no plans to build a new NAFTA Superhighway - it exists today as I-35." This, however, is at odds with reality. On December 16, 2004, The Texas Transportation Commission, well represented in NASCO, entered into an agreement with a consortium called based in Spain, with tentacles into several other countries. The Comprehensive Development Agreement is open-ended (up to 50 years), and provides for many options along the way. The goal is to build and operate a privately funded toll-corridor that includes up to 10 lanes of car and truck traffic, rail lines, pipelines and utilities, including communications systems. The current agreement is limited to Texas, but fits nicely into the master plan being advanced by NASCO. It also fits nicely into the vision of the Council on Foreign Relations’ recent report: Building a North American Community, which advocates "unlimited access to each other’s territory" (page 47), including allowing Mexican or Canadian companies to freely enter the U.S. to compete with U.S. trucking companies, hauling freight between U.S. cities. This, of course, is essential to the creation of the North American Union, the goal of the Security and Prosperity Partnership. This Partnership includes enhanced border crossings for trade, and for individuals, using a new SENTRI program being developed by the U.S. Customs Department. This massive transformation of the United States of America into the North American Union is well under way. It is being implemented with the blessings of the last three Presidents, key Congressmen, and the most powerful business and professional government leaders. There’s one small problem: no one asked the American people if they want this transformation. The entire concept has never been presented to Congress, nor to the American people for reflection, discussion, debate, and approval. Instead, powerful lobbying groups, such as NASCO, and others, present small segments of the concept, wrapped up in a package of financial benefits, and then "sell" the idea in installments. Each installment is a baby-step toward the North American Union, which is similar to the European Union, both key elements in the structure of global governance. The fundamental transformation is to our system of governance; we are moving from the system of representative government set forth in the U.S. Constitution, to a system of collaborative policy-making by professional bureaucrats and business leaders. This outcome is precisely what the President’s Council on Sustainable Development called for in its 1993 We Believe Statements: "We need a new collaborative decision process that leads to better decisions; more rapid change; and more sensible use of human, natural, and financial resources in achieving our goals." (Statement No. 8) What we really need are elected officials who listen to their constituents and refuse to be steam-rolled, or bought, by professional bureaucrats and business leaders. The Texas Transportation Commission can withdraw from its agreement with Cintra-Zachry at anytime. Perhaps the voters in Texas can call for a referendum, to see if the people of Texas really want this Super-Corridor. The people of Texas could, once again, play a vital role in saving the United States. Henry Lamb is the executive vice president of the Environmental Conservation Organization (ECO), and chairman of Sovereignty International Henry Lamb can be reached at: henry@freedom.org
Good for you. Might as well get a good deer hunting rifle and scope in case you need to forage. Never hurts to learn and be prepared. You will also need a couple of side arms. I prefer 1 semi-auto and 1 revolver, minimum. Lots of wolves where deer are.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/cover121406.htm North American Union Debut of the 'amero' Pope John Paul II, Euro By Judi McLeod Thursday, December 14, 2006 The People's Republic of China, long lauded by America's enemies as the world's next economic power, will be the country that will force the creation of the `North American Union' (NAU). Kofi Annan's former pointman, Canadian Maurice Strong, has been boasting from Chinese soil that China soon would be replacing America as economic king, using the jingo that's the official language at Turtle Bay. The billions of dollars China has invested in the flagging American economy will be worthless. They will have to negotiate the exchange rate to the new amero. This will then force the creation of the North American Union. The cloak of the NAU, fashioned in secrecy, will be thrown over an unsuspecting public, erasing the borders of three countries. Mexico, which already has legions of its citizens living and working inside America, is, in effect already inside the NAU. Their governments will inform the American and Canadian people that there is no option but the bread line. Unfortunately, the plan, which has been in place for some time, now, has been all but ignored by the mainstream media. One of the signs that the NAU is on its way is the collapse of the American greenback dollar paving the way for the debut of the 'amero'. “Two analysts who have reconstructed money supply data after the Fed stopped publishing it argue a coming dollar collapse will set the stage for creating the amero as a North American currency to replace the dollar,” (WorldNetDaily, Dec. 13, 2006). The euro followed the same blueprint of stealth and surprise. It was already issued as replacement currency before the masses could coalesce to fight it. Who ever would have dreamed that the euro of a secular bureaucracy one day would be accepted for use at the Vatican? Pope John Paul II, who repeatedly condemned the “moral drift” of secular Brussels, sanctioned an official Euro for the Vatican. In appearance, the Vatican coin looks very much like other Euro coins. But on the flip side of the coin, the image of Pope John Paul II faces left. “By permitting his image on this new coin, John Paul II has given another symbolic and powerful stimulus to the European Union, which with the issuance of the Euro, is taking an important step towards the Universal Republic,” said Atila Sinke Guimarnes in Daily Catholic. Was it all that long ago when people said the formation of the European Union was impossible? Today, the EU European holds 27 nations under its authority with other countries lined up for membership. In the US, experts are now predicting that the collapse of the dollar is imminent. “People in the U.S. are going to be hit hard,” says Bob Chapman publisher of The International Forecaster newsletter. “In the severe recession we are entering now, Bush will argue that we have to form a North American Union to compete with the Euro.” “Creating the amero,” Chapman explained, “will be presented to the American public as the administration's solution for dollar recovery. In the process of creating the amero, the Bush administration just abandons the dollar.” While the amero is being groomed to enter stage left, another phenomenon has been gathering steam outside of media headlines. The North American Union, which got its start in secrecy, has been pulled out of the closet by a grass-roots effort, that will force it onto the agenda when Nancy Pelosi and Company open the 100th congress next month. Pressed on by Conservative Caucus Chairman Howard Phillips; WND columnist and author Jerome Corsi; activist and American icon Phyllis Schlafly, leaders of the 50-member strong coalition are poised to halt any effort by the U.S. to enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada. Members of Schlafly's Eagle Forum have been in training for the past two months to lobby on Capitol Hill when Congress convenes. The resolution—sponsored by Republican Reps. Virgil Goode Jr. of Virginia, Tom Tancredo of Colorado, Walter Jones of North Carolina, and Ron Paul of Texas—expresses “the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union (NAU) with Mexico or Canada.” It's no idle boast when Phillips says, “this could be the most important project on which we've ever worked.” Armed with the Internet release of about 1,000 documents, obtained in a Freedom of Information Act request to the Security ad Prosperity Partnership of North America, the coalition has the potential to embarrass the governments of all three countries. According to Corsi, “the documents show the White House is engaging in collaborative relations with Mexico and Canada—outside the U.S. Constitution. Very little about the NAU has been covered by the Canadian media. The documents can be viewed here, on a special website set up by the Minuteman Project. The stage has been carefully set and only intervention will stop North America from taking the same stealth route that Europe took in creating the European Union and its legal tender the Euro.
What constitution?
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/cover121806.htm North American Union Anti-amero coalition needs to tap Prime Minister Steven Harper Phyllis Schlafly, Stephen Harper By Judi McLeod Monday, December 18, 2006 Message to activist Phyllis Schlafly, Conservative Caucus Chairman Howard Phillips, WorldNetDaily columnist and author Jerome Corsi and erstwhile leaders of the 50-member strong coalition poised to take the wheels off the North American Union’s (NAU’s) little red wagon: lobby Canada’s Prime Minister Stephen Harper ASAP. Why? Harper wasn’t the guy who signed the papers on the NAU at the Waco, Texas summit in 2005, launched by the stealth-styled Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. It was former Liberal Prime Minister Paul Martin who signed on to the NAU. It is highly unlikely that Harper feels the same way Martin does on the formation of the NAU. It is highly unlikely that Harper feels the same way Martin does on most given issues. Martin, the protégé of environmental guru and United Nations heavy Maurice Strong, was an avid acolyte of the UN and its dreams for one world government. Harper is not. The anti-amero coalition shouldn’t wait too long to contact the Canadian Prime Minister’s office (PMO). Most folks are in holiday mood and will remain that way until after January 1. Before heading home for their constituencies for Christmas break, Canada’s fledgling minority government was assessing the threats of the Party Quebecois which has given notice it will try to force an election over Canada’s troops in Afghanistan—a matter the Party will force on to the agenda by mid-February, 2007. This strategy coincides with the plans of Robert Pastor, identified by WorldNet Daily’s Jerome Corsi as “a leading intellectual force in the move to create an EU-style North American Community”. Imagine the enormity of Pastor’s having told Corsi that he believes a new 9/11 crisis could be the catalyst to merge the U.S., Mexico and Canada. What is the United States without sovereignty? Ditto for Canada. Pastor, a professor at American University, is the Pooh-bah who will someday erase the borders of three separate nations. “At American University in Washington, D.C., Pastor directs the Center for North American Studies where he teaches a course entitled North America: A Union, A Community, or Just Three Nationals? Pastor is on the board of the North American Forum on Integration, the NAFL, a non-profit organization that annually holds a mock trilateral parliament (emphasis CFP) for 100 selected students drawn from 10 universities in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. “Pastor had published an interview in Spanish in the Oct. 24 issue of Poder y Negocios. He told the magazine crises can force decisions that otherwise could not be made.” Does any of this sound chillingly familiar? Prime Minister Paul Martin’s lifetime mentor Maurice Strong once mused aloud to a reporter a crisis scenario very much like Pastor’s….”It’s February. They’re (world leaders) all at Davos. These aren’t terrorist. They’re world leaders. They have positioned themselves in the world’s commodities and stock markets. They’ve engineered, using their access to stock markets and computers and gold supplies, a panic. Then, they prevent the world’s stock markets from closing. They jam the gears. They hire mercenaries who hold the rest of the world leaders at Davos as hostage. The markets can’t close…” All Americans and Canadians who care about their country owe a debt of gratitude to the savvy Corsi, who took the trouble to track Pastor down to affirm that the Spanish interview really represents his thinking. “What I’m saying is that a crisis is an event which can force democratic governments to make difficult decisions like those that will be required to create a North American Community,” he said. “It’s not that I want another 9/11 crisis, but having a crisis would force decisions that might otherwise not get made.” Pastor also theorizes on Canada’s already minority government status and Mexico’s soon to be one, emphasizing the United States “lame duck” presidency. “There are alternatives to a crisis for getting a major decision adopted by the president and by the congress,” Pastor responded. “But what I am saying is that we lack the kind of North American leadership we need. Our founding fathers created a system of governance that was not designed to be efficient but was designed to protect freedom. Therefore, you created checks and balances that did protect freedom but also made it difficult to move forward on important issues.” Pastor presumes far too much when he would, in effect move on the formation of a North America union to take advantage of two minority governments and what he views as a lame duck president. Sovereignty belongs to the people and not necessarily their leaders. Meanwhile, if Schlafly and Company haven’t thought of it already, they should contact Steven Harper, PMO, Ottawa, Ontario- -ASAP.
I think I'll just stick with a knife and a shot gun. I really don't like hand guns....well, I realy don't like any guns, but the smaller guns bother me more (don't ask why, I don't know).
You do realize that Hunter is a NAU shill, a stealth candidate to split the true anti-NAU candidates.
Make your fear and weakness your strength. While you can.
http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2006/10/11/01243.html Conservative Party linked to pro-U.S. annexation cabal Activities tantamount to Treason, involving Breach of Parliamentary Oath and conspiracy to overthrow Her Majesty by Peter Mackenzie Stand Up for Canada "Stand Up for Canada" appears to have been devised as a technique of mass deception, under the joint auspices of former ultra-right wing Alliance Party and U.S. Republican Party advisors. In the last 2006 Federal Election, the Conservative Party kept trumpeting its slogan that it would "Stand up for Canada". Then, Opposition Leader Stephen Harper during that elected indicated that he would similarly "Stand Up" for Canadian sovereignty in the Arctic. Mr. Harper portrayed his party, as a party which would govern Canada with integrity and openness in a spirit of renewed democracy, in contrast with the 'corruption' of the Martin Liberals. As it turns out, these assertions by Mr. Harper could not be further from the truth. Mel Hurtig, the founder of the Council of Canadians, and also a variety of other reliable sources including veteran CNN anchor Lou Dobbs, now reveal that senior elected representatives and advisors to the Conservative Party, are currently planning a scheme that would hand over Canada to the Bush regime by 2007. The official name for this scheme, is called "North American Union". Mel Hurtig, a noted Canadian author and publisher who was the elected leader of the National Party of Canada, provided researchers with the agenda and attendee list of the so-called "North American Forum" at the Fairmont Banff Springs Hotel in Banff, Alberta, Sept. 12-14, 2006. Mel Hurtig reveals that the Stephen Harper's Government has appointed a Ministerial Team in order to "surrender" Canada to the U.S. by 2007, so that its political-military-industrial complex can fully control oil and other Canadian resources. Alberta "Conservatives", including at least one former Premier, are reportedly among prominent Harper Government operatives of this ultra-right wing effort. Mr. Hurtig said the "secret meeting was designed to undermine the democratic process." In addition, the reported Agenda undermines the Statutory position of Her Majesty the Queen of Canada, as the constitutional expression of a Canada independent from the U.S. "What is sinister about this meeting is that it involved high level government officials and some of the top and most powerful business leaders of the three countries and the North American Forum in organizing the meeting intentionally did not inform the press in any of the three countries," he said. "It was clear that the intention was to keep this important meeting about integrating the three countries out of the public eye," Mr. Hurtig further indicates. The motive for U.S. participation, according to Mr. Hurtig, was "to gain access and control Canada's extensive natural resources, including oil and water." Documents obtained by researchers associated with the Council of Canadians were marked "Internal Document, Not for Public Release." At least three current Ministers of Stephen Harper's Conservative Party minority government are cited in the Document as "ring leaders" so-to-speak, of an unlawful and anti-constitutional effort to hand Canada to the Bush regime. Canadian constitutional and related law is quite clear that any such effort by elected members of a government to subvert the political authority of the Government of Canada, constitutes breach of a Parliamentary Allegiance of Office, and broadly treason. This is because the reportedly directed efforts of Ministers in the Stephen Harper government, to hand over Canada to the political authority of Mr. Bush, as the American Head of State, without the consent of the diverse Canadian public, can only be executed by the seditious overthrowing of the Crown, i.e. Canadian Head of State. Section 128 of the Constitution Act, 1867 indicates as follows: Every member of the Senate and the House of Commons of Canada shall before taking his Seat therein take and subscribe before the Governor General or some Person authorized by him, and every Member of a Legislative Council or Legislative Assembly of any Province shall before the Lieutenant Governor of the Province or some Person authorized by him, the Oath of Allegiance contained in the Fifth Schedule to this Act; . The oath set out in the Fifth Schedule reads as follows: I, A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty... [Elizabeth II]. According to the Sixth Edition of Beauchesne's Rules & Forms of the House of Commons of Canada: Should a member violate his oath he [or she] would be amenable to the penalty of not being allowed to sit in the House of Commons. He [or she] may be suspended from taking part in the sittings while still remaining a member of Parliament, or, in a case of extreme gravity, a Bill might be passed to annul his election... The power of dealing with treason is inherent in the Parliament of every country. The leaked document clearly substantiates that Ministers of the Stephen Harper Government are sharing information with representatives of the U.S. military-industrial-complex, for the purposes of "surrendering" Canada to a U.S.-based "non-democratic authority". This apparent government-sponsored effort is designed to destroy the sovereign authority of Canadians as co-owners of their society, in violation of all Canadian Constitutional Acts since 1867. George W. Bush (left) and Stephen Harper Pursuant to Section 46 (2) of the Canadian Criminal Codes "Every one commits treason in Canada, when someone (b) without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada; Furthermore, pursuant to Section 52 of the Criminal Code of Canada, to the extent that the apparent efforts of the Stephen Harper government to surrender Canada to a non-democratic American political arrangement is seditious to "(a) the safety, security or defence of Canada," the Stephen Harper government has executed treason. If that has indeed occurred, then the Stephen Harper government, if it has any semblance of integrity, must surrender its authority to the Governor-General acting on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen of Canada, toward new Federal Election.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/151206merger.htm North American Union leader says merger just crisis away Jerome R. Corsi Prisonplanet.com Friday, December 15, 2006 Robert Pastor, a leading intellectual force in the move to create an EU-style North American Community, told WND he believes a new 9/11 crisis could be the catalyst to merge the U.S., Mexico and Canada. Pastor, a professor at American University, says that in such a case the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP – launched in 2005 by the heads of the three countries at a summit in Waco, Texas – could be developed into a continental union, complete with a new currency, the amero, that would replace the U.S. dollar just as the euro has replaced the national currencies of Europe. In May 2005, Pastor was co-chairman the Council on Foreign Relations task force that produced a report entitled "Toward a North American Community," which he has claimed is the blueprint behind the SSP declared by President Bush, Mexico's then-President Vicente Fox, and Canada's then-Prime Minister Paul Martin. At American University in Washington, D.C., Pastor directs the Center for North American Studies where he teaches a course entitled "North America: A Union, A Community, or Just Three Nations?" As WND previously has reported, Pastor is on the board of the North American Forum on Integration, the NAFI, a non-profit organization that annually holds a mock trilateral parliament for 100 selected students drawn from 10 universities in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. Pastor had published an interview in Spanish in the Oct. 24 issue of Poder y Negocios. He told the magazine crises can force decisions that otherwise would not be made. "The 9/11 crisis made Canada and the United States redefine the protection of their borders," Pastor explained. "The debt crisis in Mexico forced the government to adapt a new economic model. The crises oblige the governments to make difficult decisions." This was the first time WND had found a major intellectual leader behind the push to integrate North America suggesting that a crisis of 9-11 proportions might be just what was needed to advance the process toward establishing a North American Union and the amero. WND reached Pastor in his office at American University and conducted a telephone interview to make sure the Spanish publication accurately reflected his views. He affirmed the Spanish interview represents his thinking. "What I'm saying is that a crisis is an event which can force democratic governments to make difficult decisions like those that will be required to create a North American Community," he said. "It's not that I want another 9/11 crisis, but having a crisis would force decisions that otherwise might not get made." Pastor noted, for example that "Europeans, facing the crisis of two World Wars, turned to the European Community as a means to prevent war and advance their economic interests." "The United States turned to the Marshall Plan when faced with the crisis of Western Europe falling into the hands of communism," he said. "So, I'm not advocating, or encouraging, or wanting a crisis, I'm only saying that in order to take important initiatives, sometimes one manner in which this occurs is when there is a crisis to which leaders need to respond." Pastor told WND he lamented that the leadership of the three North American countries is not positioned to make the type of tough decisions needed to advance a North American Community agenda. In his interview with Poder y Negocios, he argued, "Canada has a minority government and Mexico will soon have a minority government that will be confronted with what amounts to an uprising that we hope will be peaceful. The United States has a lame duck president whose principle preoccupation is the war in Iraq and instability in the Middle East." Pastor further told WND Mexico's Fox made a tactical mistake by laying out an overly ambitious agenda to integrate with the United States. "President Bush then took on the issue of illegal immigration, and it proved to be much more difficult than anticipated," he said. In the absence of strong North American leadership, is a crisis the way greater North American integration can be expected to happen? "There are alternatives to a crisis for getting a major decision adopted by the president and by the congress," Pastor responded. "But what I am saying is that we lack the kind of North American leadership we need. Our founding fathers created a system of governance that was not designed to be efficient but was designed to protect freedom. Therefore, you created checks and balances that did protect freedom but also made it difficult to move forward on important issues." Pastor was asked what North American leaders would need to do to move toward integration. "We need to form a customs union to move North American integration to a new level," Pastor argued. "A customs union would eliminate rules of origin on the border and agree to a common external tariff. This would not be easy but not as difficult as NAFTA was, and it would lead to efficiencies in our economies and in the end contribute to a better standard of living for all parties." Pastor also called for a North American Investment Fund to invest in Mexico's infrastructure. "If we had a North American Investment Fund," Pastor explained, "over the long term, you would narrow the income gap between Mexico and the U.S." WND previously reported Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, dropped his support for legislation (S. 3622) he introduced in the 109th Congress to create a North American Investment Fund after WND pointed out the proposed law would advance an important part of Pastor's agenda to create a North American Community. Pastor was careful to distinguish that his proposals were designed to create a North American Community and that he never has proposed to create a North American Union as an EU-style regional government. "What I am recommending is a series of functional steps that are more than incremental," Pastor admitted. "Each of the proposals I have laid out represent more than just small steps. But it doesn't represent a leap toward a North American Union, or even to some confederation of any kind. I don't think either is plausible, necessary, or even helpful to contemplate at this stage." The idea seems to be to put new structures in place that change the look of the landscape. WND pointed out to Pastor that this step-by-step approach is the same approach taken to create the European Union. The memoirs of Jean Monnet, regarded as the architect of European unity, finally disclosed he had used a strategy of deceit, knowing his plan to form a European Union would never succeed if it were openly disclosed. Pastor was asked if he thought a North American Union was a bad idea. "No," he replied. "I don't think a political union of North America is an inherently bad idea, nor do I think it is a good idea for North America right now. I teach a course at American University in which I look at the different options for political integration of North America, and I put the options before the students." Then why is a North American Union a bad idea right now? "The reason the political integration is not a good idea at this stage now, perhaps never, is because of people like yourself who immediately begin to fear that their sense of America could disappear," Pastor responded. "Somehow, if you're fearful that America's sovereignty will disappear, you won't even take small steps forward. You just get mired in the status quo. The problem is that the world is moving very rapidly, and you can't stay competitive if you don't move." Pastor did not reject the idea that a North American Union could form, but only after further continental economic integration and the development of a North American Community in which people are able to think as citizens of North America. Is China the winner in the NAFTA super-corridors being planned for North America? "If you define trade in zero-sum terms, China may be the winner in the transportation corridors," Pastor conceded. "But even in zero-sum terms, consumers benefit from the increasing imports that give them more choice and give them more quality. In the final analysis, we are all consumers." Pastor affirmed he favors globalism. "I believe," he explained to WND, "that globalization is a net plus for the world economy, for the middle class, and for all people."
SM....now why'd ya haveta go and say that? *grumble*grumble*grumble* You got a point.....
Harper, Hunter and all the other traitors aren't dealing with your average sheeple here.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/011206dollarfall.htm Dollar Fall Is Catalyst For Predatory Global Government Americans remain ignorant to 35% devaluation of their bank savings as skids are greased for introduction of Amero, North American Union Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones Prison Planet Friday, December 1, 2006 As the dollar goes into free fall and the housing market accelerates in sales yet plunges in price, the quickening of an agenda of economic catastrophe allied to the "solution" of predatory globalism and the creation of a North American Union is afoot, and it spells potential disaster for the livelihood of all Americans. Home prices have dropped 24% in the last year and most of that fall has happened in the last six months. The dollar has devalued around 35% against its level six years ago and is being trounced by the Euro and Sterling. A false impression of a rosy economy is being spun with the rise of the stock market. Former fed chief Alan Greenspan's doubling of the money supply and Bernanke's promise that the money supply will be doubled again leads to only one outcome. Common sense tells us that a dollar sink is inevitable and if the housing market isn't the place to put all these devalued dollars then that excess will chase the stock market. Taking into consideration the devalued dollar, the stock market is really at about 6,000 - not 12,000. All the real indices of financial health tell us that the economy is in the toilet. Treasury Secretary Snow and others have publicly stated their desire for a weak dollar, sending the foreign lenders who have been propping up the greenback, particularly Japan and China, heading for the hills and dumping the dollar. The catalyst for this was comments made in November 2004 by Snow, when he told a seminar in London that, "The history of efforts to impose nonmarket valuations on currencies is at best unrewarding and checkered." The Japan Times reported that on the back of this statement, Tokyo traders began dumping the greenback and have continued ever since, leading to a situation today where the dollar recently fell to its lowest value in the world market in 15 years. The excuse that a weak dollar should be privately encouraged to reduce trade and fiscal deficits is continually debunked by the fact that deficits with Japan and China reached all time highs - more than $200 billion with China in 2005 exactly a year after Snow's comments and continue to rise further this year. Chieftains of industry and government like Dick Cheney, Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are trying to creep towards the door in their sell-off of the dollar because they hold so much greenback and wish to quietly cash out. That process is now accelerating and it now appears a mad scramble for the door is about to ensue, to the cost of hundreds of millions of American citizens who remain completely ignorant to the fact that their bank account savings have lost 35% of their value just sitting there since 2001. Talking heads and controlled media continue to assure Americans that the economy is booming and there's little to worry about. No doubt the dollar will rebound a little in a few weeks and they'll show a short-term graph of its steady climb over the past month, failing to display comparison charts going back six years which show the greenback heading straight down. Establishment mouthpieces tell viewers to go back to sleep while former World Bank chief economist and nobel prize winner Joseph Stiglitz predicts a global crash - caused by the very predatory globalist policies of the IMF and World Bank that are still presented to us as the solution for economic turmoil. A global crash and a totally devalued dollar that can barely rival the peso spells disaster for all Americans who wish to maintain their standard of living and not find themselves barefoot on the street in a bread queue. But fear not, because the very predatory globalism that caused all this calamity in the first place has yet another answer to our prayers! It's the Amero, the North American currency that will unify the States, Mexico and Canada and its latest cheerleader is influential London investment firm VP Steve Previs. The Amero would offer a nice umbrella under which to force through the Free Trade Area of the Americas and a North American Union, an eternal dream of the Rockefeller elite clique that is seeking to erect a one world government system by first aping the European Union in creating a single currency and trading bloc, again to the devastation of middle class America but to the delight of transnational corporations who can exploit cheap labor while putting millions of Americans out of a job. The fed and the plunge protection team are not going to rescue the situation. Gold and silver continue to remain stable and steadily growing assets and we encourage all our readers to build a sizable portfolio in order to offset the coming meltdown that the cavalier and dangerous financial policies of the U.S. government, along with the ceaseless march towards global government, will inevitably engender.
I honestly don't know why I typed that. It wasn't meant specifically, as I don't know you from Adam (or Eve).
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/lou.dobbs.tonight/ Created: Wednesday, November 29, 2006, at 18:42:41 EDT A North American Union (Mexico, the United States and Canada), a really good idea or a really bad idea? A really good idea 7% A really bad idea 93%
Is China the winner in the NAFTA super-corridors being planned for North America? "If you define trade in zero-sum terms, China may be the winner in the transportation corridors," Pastor conceded. "But even in zero-sum terms, consumers benefit from the increasing imports that give them more choice and give them more quality. In the final analysis, we are all consumers." Ole Pastor ain't so stealth no mo now es he?
speechless.
http://canada.usembassy.gov/content/content.asp?section=can_usa&subsection1=meetings&document=spp Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America On March 23, 2005, Presidents Bush and Fox, along with Prime Minister Martin launched a new partnership - the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) - to "develop new avenues of cooperation that will make our open societies safer and more secure, our businesses more competitive, and our economies more resilient." The Embassy of the United States of America 490 Sussex Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 1G8 Canada 613-238-5335
I know...but, it was true, and an excellent point, which I must really think over....as being quite a rational action to take.
Treasury Secretary Snow and others have publicly stated their desire for a weak dollar, sending the foreign lenders who have been propping up the greenback, particularly Japan and China, heading for the hills and dumping the dollar. Oh yes, Sec. Snow. CSX Snow.
http://www.nwlanews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=679&Itemid=29 No North American Union Written by Douglas Logan Friday, 27 October 2006 Dear Editor: Many Americans remain unaware of the simple historical fact that our nation was created by the states, not the reverse. The federal system built by our nation’s Founders established a national government with very few duties and limited powers. Each state was to remain independent in most areas. This system ultimately assured that the American people would make our nation the most powerful and productive in modem history. In more recent years, the federal government has usurped many of the powers of the states, and the federal government has begun taking steps that would steer the United States into an independence-compromising regional government called the North American Union. It sounds like a fantasy, or a bad dream, but it is not. The October 2 issue of The New American describes already-established plans that could result in our nation becoming subject to a new agreement among the governments of the U.S., Mexico and Canada, the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). If not blocked, the agreement would mean that the three countries could become~ in effect, a single entity. Our borders would essentially be erased, Canadian and Mexican law enforcement personnel would be integrated into our new Homeland Security Department, and a huge highway system would be erected among the three countries to facilitate delivery of Mexican and other goods to the U.S. and Canada. Such a highway system would lead to increased illegal immigration, large-scale eminent domain takings of private property along the planned highways, and increased law enforcement problems along these same highways. Our nation’s motto, E Pluribus Unum, means “Out of Many, One” - out of many independent states, one national government for strictly limited purposes. America’s Founders ~ intended to destroy the states as independent entities. For your family, your state, and your country, please help win approval in our state legislature. “To withdraw the U.S. from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and any other bilateral or multilateral activity which seeks to create a North American Union.” Douglas A. Logan Heflin, Louisiana
http://newsbusters.org/ North American Union Posted by libertyordeath on November 1, 2006 - 14:17. The Bush administration once again is caught in an outright lie. The bill signing for a border fence following the deployment of the National Guard to the border is a farce, as the Security and Prosperity Partnership is well on it's way to destroying the sovereignty of this country by planning and overseeing the contruction of a NAFTA superhighway stretching from Canada to Mexico and beyond, creating the North American Union. http://www.cfr.org/publication/8102/ For more information, simply type North American Union into any search engine. A resolution has already been created by a group of congressmen and senators denouncing any such plan.
This is challenging all other "Big Lies" for top billing.
http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/10/262006f.asp Borderless Continent Objective of Alleged 'Union,' Says Coalition Spokesman By Jim Brown October 26, 2006 WASHINGTON, DC (AgapePress) - A coalition is attempting to bring attention to what it calls a "stealth plan" to merge the U.S. with Mexico and Canada to create a "North American Union." The group, known as the Coalition to Block the North American Union, announced on Wednesday that it is supporting a House concurrent resolution opposing a NAFTA super-highway system from the west coast of Mexico through the U.S. and into Canada. The resolution is sponsored by Representatives Virgil Goode (VA), Ron Paul (TX), Walter Jones (NC), and Tom Tancredo (CO). Members of the Coalition claim a "Security and Prosperity Partnership" (SPP) adopted by President Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin, and former Mexican President Vicente Fox would erase U.S. borders, replace the dollar with the "amero," and lead to unlimited immigration. Jerome Corsi, co-chairman of the Coalition, says working groups within the SPP are meeting in secret behind closed doors and rewriting administrative law. "We no longer have U.S. administrative law and regulations over areas including e-commerce, steel, energy, environmental policy, textiles, border crossing, trusted travelers/trusted traders, aviation," Corsi asserts. "There's hardly a major area of public policy where the Bush administration has not, through the SPP working groups, rewritten our administrative law and regulations from being U.S. in nature to being North American in nature." Corsi charges that the SPP working groups are a shadow government working daily to rewrite American laws and regulations with counterpart bureaucrats in Canada and Mexico. All of this, he states, is being done without the knowledge of the American people and most members of Congress. "What we charge is that under way, below the radar screen, is essentially a Bush administration coup d'état, creating a regional North American Union on the same stealth plan that was put into effect in Europe," he says. "The key issue is deniability: the administrators involved in this, the globalists and the bureaucrats who are involved in it from the Bush administration would say, 'No, we're just building a highway.'" According to Corsi, the "Trans-Texas Corridor" is designed to function as a NAFTA super-highway, opening Mexican ports with Red Chinese goods from Mexican trucks and trains to move north into the center of the United States. The group that will build and finance the Corridor, he notes, is a group in Spain named "Cintra" -- and the tolls on that road will go to Cintra, he says. Jim Brown, a regular contributor to AgapePress, is a reporter for American Family Radio News, which can be heard online. © 2006 AgapePress all rights reserved.
Isn't it, though?!
Comments (81 - 143) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestNorth American Union Threatens U.S. Sovereignty. Alan Caruba The problem with the Bush administration is that not enough of its officials have read the U.S. ...
www.informationliberation.com/?id=14790 - 32k -
#42. To: SovereignMan (#28)
North American Union
Globalization North American Union...
www.scoreboard-canada.com/northamerican.htm - 87k -
#43. To: SovereignMan (#35)
I'd say the Stop the NAU underswell is mounting and the more they try to stop it, the faster it spreads.
#44. To: Scrivener (#43)
#45. To: SovereignMan (#28)
#46. To: SovereignMan (#28)
#47. To: TwentyTwelve (#41)
#48. To: SovereignMan (#28)
#49. To: TwentyTwelve (#46)
#50. To: SovereignMan (#33)
The Center for North American Studies and the Washington College of Law of American University are co‐sponsoring a conference on whether a uniform legal system for all three countries of North America is conceivable, desirable, or possible. Some of the most distinguished legal scholars and practitioners from Canada, Mexico, and the United States will address the issues in comparative terms by examining the example of Europe and the tensions caused y federalism but, also, by focusing on applied legal areas, such as trade, the environment, and family law.
#51. To: SovereignMan (#44)
The cost of freedom isn't free.
#52. To: SovereignMan (#49)
#53. To: SovereignMan (#49)
#54. To: SovereignMan (#49)
#55. To: SovereignMan (#49)
#56. To: Scrivener (#51)
#57. To: SovereignMan (#49)
#58. To: Happy2BMe-OnLP (#50)
#59. To: SovereignMan (#49)
#60. To: SovereignMan (#56)
You will also need a couple of side arms.
#61. To: TwentyTwelve (#53)
Outraged by this plan, four patriotic Congressmen (Reps. Virgil H. Good, Walter B. Jones, Ron Paul, and Tom Tancredo) have introduced H. Con. Res. 487, which states that "the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada." In the last few weeks, patriot Americans from all over the United States have been telephoning their Congressmen demanding that H. Con. Res. 487 be put to a vote and passed in 2007.
#62. To: Scrivener (#60)
#63. To: SovereignMan (#61)
#64. To: SovereignMan (#61)
#65. To: SovereignMan (#62)
Make your fear and weakness your strength. While you can.
#66. To: TwentyTwelve (#63)
Mel Hurtig, the founder of the Council of Canadians, and also a variety of other reliable sources including veteran CNN anchor Lou Dobbs, now reveal that senior elected representatives and advisors to the Conservative Party, are currently planning a scheme that would hand over Canada to the Bush regime by 2007. The official name for this scheme, is called "North American Union".
#67. To: SovereignMan (#66)
#68. To: Scrivener (#65)
#69. To: SovereignMan (#66)
#70. To: TwentyTwelve (#64)
Pastor did not reject the idea that a North American Union could form, but only after further continental economic integration and the development of a North American Community in which people are able to think as citizens of North America.
#71. To: SovereignMan, TwentyTwelve, QBC, Indalay (#66)
Mel Hurtig, the founder of the Council of Canadians, and also a variety of other reliable sources including veteran CNN anchor Lou Dobbs, now reveal that senior elected representatives and advisors to the Conservative Party, are currently planning a scheme that would hand over Canada to the Bush regime by 2007. The official name for this scheme, is called "North American Union".
#72. To: SovereignMan (#66)
#73. To: SovereignMan (#58)
U.S.C. § 2381 Treason
#74. To: SovereignMan (#68)
I honestly don't know why I typed that. It wasn't meant specifically, as I don't know you from Adam (or Eve).
#75. To: TwentyTwelve (#67)
All the real indices of financial health tell us that the economy is in the toilet.
#76. To: SovereignMan (#66)
#77. To: SovereignMan (#75)
#78. To: Scrivener (#71)
speechless.
#79. To: SovereignMan (#75)
#80. To: SovereignMan (#78)
This is challenging all other "Big Lies" for top billing.
.
.
.